Decision-Making in Early Internationalization: A Structured Expert Judgement Approach

نویسندگان

چکیده

The aim of this chapter is to show how a structured approach elicit expert judgement (SEJ) can guide the practice early internationalization. We applied SEJ forecast some critical issues upon which an innovative start-up wished base their decision whether expand initial operations in Poland and Czech Republic Brazil. Sixteen participants Executive MBA program acted as experts underwent procedure for eliciting judgements. performance was quantified terms statistical accuracy informativeness, were combined provide performance-based weight each according Classical Model. combination weighted judgements led improved informativeness forecast. demonstrates entrepreneurs take advantage knowledge deciding about risky endeavours when lacking own experiences reliable data that choices.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Decision behaviour – Improving expert judgement

In this chapter, common biases in professionals’ judgement and decision-making, and how these deviations can be corrected, are explained. A principal reason for these decision biases is human beings cognitive limitations. Due to these limitations, simplifying strategies are often used, producing predictable biases. Emotional and motivational factors may also contribute to reduced decision quali...

متن کامل

Adaptive Expert Decision Making:

Previous research has suggested that depth of search in chess does not increase much as a function of skill. We submitted players to a problem-solving task with complex positions. We found a strong skill effect in depth of search, rate of search, and number of nodes generated. At the level of strong masters, the absolute values of these variables were much higher than in previous studies (somet...

متن کامل

Expert Judgement and Expert Disagreement

As Hammond has argued, traditional explanations for disagreement among experts (incompetence, venality, and ideology) are inadequate. The character and fallibilities of the human judgement process itself lead to persistent disagreements even among competent, honest, and disinterested experts. Social Judgement Theory provides powerful methods for analysing such judgementally based disagreements ...

متن کامل

Evaluation of recommender systems: A multi-criteria decision making approach

The evaluation and selection of recommender systems is a difficult decision making process. This difficulty is partially due to the large diversity of published evaluation criteria in addition to lack of standardized methods of evaluation. As such, a systematic methodology is needed that explicitly considers multiple, possibly conflicting metrics and assists decision makers to evaluate and find...

متن کامل

Measuring the quality of judgement and decision-making in nursing.

AIM This paper discusses measurement of the quality of judgement and decision-making in nursing research. It examines theoretical and research issues surrounding how to measure judgement accuracy as a component of evaluating decision-making in nursing practice. DISCUSSION Judgement accuracy is discussed with reference to different methods of measurement, including comparing judgements with in...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: International series in management science/operations research

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['0884-8289', '2214-7934']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46474-5_23